#Floppy emulator usb driver windows#
VMS – still going as the core of Windows NT, also as itself. Now let’s look at some other old operating system designs that inspired modern systems: most system calls doesn’t touch MACH code. OS/X isn’t a MACH based operating system, it incorporates MACH, yes but:
Even when MACH was used IBM and Apple designed their own kernels to improve performance – and skipped the resulting products when they performed much worse than anticipated. 3 decades in the computing field are an eternity however, and a lot has happened since then.
You know, the opposite of being a failure. I was simply pointing out that Mach is a very old project, it did its thing, it had a lot of influence in the field, and a bunch of products sprung out of it. It’s also a failure in that it retarded the micro-kernel research for a long time as many people thought microkernel = MACH level performance. The overheads of MACH meant that anyone using it had to have much better hardware than the competition. No it is a failure as it isn’t used – and for good reasons.
I see what the problem is your comprehension skills are basically nil. So basically you think that old = failure.
0 kommentar(er)
